PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 95.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME Z270-AR (all builds) |
Memory | 7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20161208 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 30 '19 at 03:21 |
Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 65% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-7600K-$210
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
|
44.8%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 170 179 177 166 173 MB/s
|
95.3%
Outstanding
|
|||
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB
719GB free
Firmware: JKAOA20N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 93 95 93 95 MB/s
|
53.7%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
50.5%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 549x |
Core i5-7600KIntel $210Bench 76%, 195,006 samples | 202x |
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 86x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 172x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 137x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 94x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 93% - Outstanding | Total price: $694 |