Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive337% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '19 at 19:49
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 77
1-Core 149
2-Core 296
93% 174 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 1,097
100% 837 Pts
64-Core 1,476
91% 1,476 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2702 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 148
Parallax 130
119% 141 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 141
Splatting 113
101% 124 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
579GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3853 3922 1015 856 866 935 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
337% Outstanding
Read 2,269
Write 3,680
Mixed 2,234
SusWrite 1,908
571% 2,523 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 70.7
246% 89.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1410
DQ Write 1,013
DQ Mixed 1,259
928% 1,227 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 337%
Great: 491%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
446GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 463 463 461 441 290 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 450
Mixed 449
SusWrite 430
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 56.3
186% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 199
150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 114%
Great: 129%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
119GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 455 453 454 456 455 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 448
Mixed 331
SusWrite 454
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 83.9
4K Mixed 41.6
149% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 122
113% 174 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
90GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 287 287 288 287 287 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 449
Mixed 405
SusWrite 306
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 57.7
190% 65.2 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 199
150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$34
931GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 200 211 211 194 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 141
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 198
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.7% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 28.2
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 28.6
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,751 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $1,196
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback