Asus G10AC

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus G10AC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G10AC
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20130524
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '19 at 21:47
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	47%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	Memory 43.3 1-Core 27.4 2-Core 47.6 26% 39.4 Pts	4-Core 108 8-Core 325 24% 216 Pts	64-Core 517 32% 517 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435 47,610 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Asus(1043 841C) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.1% Poor	Lighting 30.8 Reflection 31.8 Parallax 40.3 25% 34.3 fps	MRender 45.8 Gravity 37 Splatting 32.7 31% 38.5 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk U100 128GB 2,261 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10.56.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 38 32 38 39 35 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	28% Poor	Read 364 Write 37.8 Mixed 45.5 SusWrite 35.6 26% 121 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 9.7 4K Mixed 8 34% 10.1 MB/s	DQ Read 34.3 DQ Write 10.4 DQ Mixed 12.6 12% 19.1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 55%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB 13,039 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 280GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 39 38 40 41 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	13.1% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 34.5 Mixed 38 SusWrite 39.2 8% 36 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 10.2 4K Mixed 9 26% 8.4 MB/s	DQ Read 26.2 DQ Write 24.4 DQ Mixed 25 19% 25.2 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 99%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABS0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 166 163 164 165 161 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 152 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 163 92% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 128% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 108%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB 2,761 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 115GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 42 52 41 51 36 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	33.6% Below average	Read 124 Write 52.3 Mixed 69.5 SusWrite 45.4 88% 72.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1.6 123% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 35%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 510 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 291GB free, PID a00a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 24 26 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Read 29 Write 27 Mixed 17 SusWrite 25.2 33% 24.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 62% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GB 2,816 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	46.5% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 17.2 53% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 7.4 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 187 21% 187 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G10AC Builds (Compare 363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus G10AC

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	211x
Core i7-4770SIntel $102Bench 71%, 13,157 samples	92x
Core i5-4570Intel $62Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	21x

GPU
GTX 760 (192-bit)NvidiaBench 20%, 10,656 samples	60x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	35x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	25x

SSD
RBU-SC400S37128G 128GBKingstonBench 70%, 864 samples	16x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	11x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	36x
MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GBAdataBench 54%, 2,816 samples	22x
ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 4x8GBKingstonBench 56%, 370 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $75

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16