Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2160 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171101
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateNov 07 '19 at 06:44
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 82.2
1-Core 135
2-Core 268
88% 162 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 807
79% 648 Pts
64-Core 1049
65% 1049 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
PNY(196E 1211) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
111% Outstanding
Lighting 148
Reflection 151
Parallax 143
121% 147 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 148
Splatting 110
99% 122 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 291 160 142 130 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 388
Mixed 382
SusWrite 205
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 52.8
184% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 357
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 105%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 135 138 139 142 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 150
Write 142
Mixed 105
SusWrite 139
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 83%
Great: 96%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
28GB free, PID 0743
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 38 38 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 38.7
Write 37.5
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 37.4
50% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 4.3
274% 5.27 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.9% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 10.3
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10.1
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback