Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	63.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Extreme
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$216 218,680 User benchmarks, average bench 82% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	1-Core 124 2-Core 242 86% 183 Pts	4-Core 474 8-Core 923 86% 699 Pts	64-Core 1,302 87% 1,302 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$210 32,423 User benchmarks, average bench 63% MSI(1462 3792) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Lighting 288 Reflection 223 Parallax 261 76% 257 fps	MRender 148 Gravity 234 Splatting 175 63% 186 fps
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 66%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$69 11,398 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete		Read 496 Write 481 Mixed 339 98% 439 MB/s	4K Read 39.3 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 54 187% 67.6 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 359 DQ Mixed 321 255% 355 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$59 57,239 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	MC Read 34.1 MC Write 32.9 MC Mixed 29.1 92% 32 GB/s	SC Read 23.1 SC Write 31.8 SC Mixed 25.9 77% 26.9 GB/s	Latency 77.1 52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 87%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 57%

Gunboat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $60Bench 106%, 224,064 samples	1,285x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $80Bench 270%, 134,973 samples	876x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $71Bench 233%, 93,032 samples	710x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $58Bench 84%, 285,104 samples	2,468x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $80Bench 87%, 164,531 samples	1,025x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $65Bench 87%, 90,333 samples	889x

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $604

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613	SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24