Asus P8P67 DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	88% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	86.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111130
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 08 '19 at 20:07
Run Duration	237 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	53%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Memory 91.7 1-Core 93.8 2-Core 186 73% 124 Pts	4-Core 312 8-Core 461 48% 387 Pts	64-Core 470 29% 470 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.7 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	88% Excellent	Lighting 113 Reflection 117 Parallax 101 92% 110 fps	MRender 98.4 Gravity 99.4 Splatting 97.9 81% 98.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 832GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 435 445 463 470 468 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Read 401 Write 404 Mixed 339 SusWrite 446 90% 397 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 56.3 4K Mixed 25.8 100% 35.5 MB/s	DQ Read 290 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 292 219% 291 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 133%
Marvell Raid VD 0 4TB 324 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 2.5TB free Firmware: MV.R SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 83 84 87 86 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 97.3 Write 32.8 Mixed 43 SusWrite 83.3 47% 64.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 157%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 810GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	25.7% Poor	Read 125 Write 138 Mixed 64.8 SusWrite 1.7 103% 82.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 55%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 4TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 91.8 Write 102 Mixed 50.5 SusWrite 0 76% 61 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 9.6 4K Mixed 0.6 348% 3.53 MB/s	DQ Read 0.2 DQ Write 14.5 DQ Mixed 0.9 524% 5.2 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 92%
WDC WD30 EZRS-00J99B0 3TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 3TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 2.6 2.8 1.1 2.2 2.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	0.81% Terrible	Read 2 Write 1.7 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 2.4 3% 1.98 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.81% Great: 45%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 40 Write 26 Mixed 35 SusWrite 0.3 31% 25.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 40%
ST4000DM 000-2AE166 4TB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 903GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 84.8 Write 74.3 Mixed 9.3 SusWrite 0 48% 42.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 20,667 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	49.4% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15.4 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 16.9 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 64.7 62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 DELUXE - $100

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	582x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	159x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	105x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	75x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	60x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	60x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	41x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	36x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	32x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	50x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	39x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $728

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16