Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics39.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101209
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 11 '19 at 23:58
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 81
1-Core 44.6
2-Core 85.4
47% 70.3 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 198
19% 155 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Asus(1043 3006) 3GB
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Lighting 51.4
Reflection 33.3
Parallax 64.5
42% 49.7 fps
MRender 32.6
Gravity 51.6
Splatting 41.6
34% 41.9 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 61 55 67 62 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
44% Average
Read 94
Write 91.3
Mixed 47
SusWrite 59.2
53% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
137% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 44%
Great: 109%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
276GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 63 58 68 63 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 90.8
Write 41.5
Mixed 56
SusWrite 60.9
46% 62.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 75%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
175GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 80 81 81 80 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 79.3
Write 70.7
Mixed 49
SusWrite 79.7
51% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown OCZ3F1600LV2G OCZ3F1600LV2G OCZ3F1600LV2G OCZ3F1600LV2G 8GB
533, 533, 533, 533 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.7% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 10.4
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 5.4
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback