PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 5.71% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8B75-M (all builds) |
Memory | 7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120301 |
Uptime | 5.3 Days |
Run Date | Nov 12 '19 at 01:54 |
Run Duration | 196 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
|
55.8%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 580-$130
Gigabyte(1458 22FD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1365 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.11.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
5.71%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 75 70 75 74 70 MB/s
|
38.2%
Below average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
102GB free
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 114 127 122 122 122 MB/s
|
65.8%
Good
|
|||
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
7TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 26 27 26 MB/s
|
24.1%
Poor
|
|||
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB
23GB free, PID a82a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 8.5 11 16 17 20 MB/s
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
34.8%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 387x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 205x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 131x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 103x |
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 97x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 87x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $906 |