Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4100M 1,320 User benchmarks, average bench 53% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Memory 89.2 1-Core 72.5 2-Core 134 61% 98.5 Pts	4-Core 198 8-Core 197 26% 197 Pts	64-Core 199 12% 199 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 61%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$25 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 206GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900E12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 154 153 161 163 155 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	55.8% Above average	Read 216 Write 300 Mixed 224 SusWrite 166 51% 227 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 57.1 4K Mixed 31.8 112% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 34.9 DQ Write 68 DQ Mixed 39.8 34% 47.6 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 91%
A-DATA USB Flash Drive 8GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID c82a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.3 5.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	3.46% Terrible	Read 11 Write 3.7 Mixed 0.5 SusWrite 5.4 6% 5.15 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.46% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GB 64,960 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.1% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 8.8 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 9.6 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-4100MIntelBench 53%, 1,320 samples	3x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	3x

SSD
120GB SATA SSD 120GBPNYBench 69%, 681 samples	3x

RAM
HMT451S6MFR8C-PB Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 8GBHynixBench 47%, 22 samples	2x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16