Intel NUC6CAYB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemIntel(R) NUC6CAYH
MotherboardIntel NUC6CAYB  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '19 at 10:25
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Celeron J3455
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
29.2% Poor
1-Core 46.3
2-Core 92.4
33% 69.3 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 176
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 181
12% 181 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 2067) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6912
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.06% Terrible
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 6
Parallax 7.6
2% 7.4 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 8.5
2% 7.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.06%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$49
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P181106a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 114 136 185 186 197 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 360
Write 74
Mixed 100
SusWrite 144
37% 170 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 12
58% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 6
DQ Write 1.1
DQ Mixed 0.5
1% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KNG/4G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
24.1% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 7.7
26% 9.07 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.1
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 32%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical NUC6CAYB Builds (Compare 387 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC6CAYB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 13% - Very poor Total price: $25
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $330Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $82SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback