Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3048h
Memory1.1 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090825
Uptime17.7 Days
Run DateDec 01 '16 at 07:31
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 83%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E6700-$199
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 62.5
1-Core 40.7
2-Core 60.7
37% 54.6 Pts
4-Core 61.2
8-Core 72.3
9% 66.8 Pts
64-Core 73
4% 73 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 380
Nvidia(10DE 063B) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.95
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.13% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 2.12
Parallax 0.41
1% 1.17 fps
MRender 3.57
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 2.17
2% 2.16 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.13%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$56
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.03E03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 62.2
Write 63.9
Mixed 59.2
46% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 0.96
4K Mixed 0.22
54% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 59%
WDC WD50 00AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
21GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.2% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 28.5
Mixed 14.2
30% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 2.09
4K Mixed 0.35
85% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:85 9B CT51264BA1339.C16 40GB
1333, 0 MHz
4096, 36864 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 4
12% 4.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 2.8
10% 3.37 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $143
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback