Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151028
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 25 '19 at 11:51
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 94.4
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 496
65% 488 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Lighting 34.2
Reflection 34
Parallax 30.5
28% 32.9 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 31.8
Splatting 32.2
28% 33.8 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 84 79 76 75 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 490
Mixed 328
SusWrite 101
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 54.7
196% 69.5 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 182
186% 301 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37
55GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 89 93 98 91 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 260
Write 125
Mixed 174
SusWrite 96.9
36% 164 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 93.4
4K Mixed 37.6
143% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 92.8
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 78.9
68% 99 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
75GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 128 137 132 123 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 125
Write 128
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 126
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 109%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
18GB free, PID a008
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 85 87 87 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 74.3
Write 74.5
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 86.1
89% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 41%
ADATA HE720 500GB
17GB free, PID a22a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 85 84 84 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 74.3
Write 75.5
Mixed 32
SusWrite 84.2
89% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1632 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
63.4% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 19.7
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 20.5
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 58.7
68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,769 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $940
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback