IBM System x3300 M4: -[7382E2G]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemIBM System x3300 M4: -[7382E2G]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM 00AK877
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20131112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '19 at 15:09
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2420 0
Socket 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 63.1
2-Core 125
56% 90.2 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 361
37% 299 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 63%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI Logical Volume 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 11 13 16 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 23.1
Write 15.1
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 14
13% 17.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
26% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 108%
Hua723020ala640 59Y5485 59Y1811IBM 2TB
964GB free
Firmware: MK7OA930
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 114 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 119
Write 111
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 113
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ81RF4ECFA-DJ-F 2x8GB
2 of 12 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.8% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 8.7
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 7.2
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback