Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P8700-$42 7,366 User benchmarks, average bench 37% Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	42.1% Average	Memory 72.5 1-Core 36.8 2-Core 72.7 41% 60.7 Pts	4-Core 70.8 8-Core 72.4 10% 71.6 Pts	64-Core 70 4% 70 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220M 962 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 1AD2) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.13% Terrible	Lighting 2.47 Reflection 4.92 Parallax 0.81 2% 2.73 fps	MRender 3.67 Gravity 1.73 Splatting 3.17 2% 2.86 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.13% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Jamesdonkey JD240 240GB 1,127 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 200GB free (System drive) Firmware: JD2019 SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 213 204 206 211 195 MB/s Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.8% Average	Read 236 Write 219 Mixed 212 SusWrite 205 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 44.2 4K Mixed 13.6 63% 24.1 MB/s	DQ Read 89.1 DQ Write 141 DQ Mixed 21.6 43% 83.8 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	18.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 5.3 16% 5.7 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5.6 16% 5.5 GB/s	Latency 95.7 42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo T6600IntelBench 35%, 8,673 samples	7x
Core2 Duo P8700Intel $42Bench 37%, 7,366 samples	6x
Core2 Duo P7450Intel $90Bench 36%, 2,755 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce GT 220MNvidiaBench 2%, 962 samples	21x
Radeon Pro WX 4100AMDBench 16%, 929 samples	2x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	2x
MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 82%, 2,092 samples	2x
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $31Bench 101%, 14,082 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16