| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Supermicro X11DAi-N (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Supermicro X11DAi-N |
| Memory | 45.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180703 |
| Uptime | 3 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 28 '19 at 14:11 |
| Run Duration | 77 Seconds |
| Run User | SAU-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8173M
CPU1, 1 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
70.2%
Very good
|
71% 126 Pts
|
60% 513 Pts
|
189% 3,056 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATI FirePro V Graphics Adapter
AMD(1002 0B0C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
19.1%
Very poor
|
16% 23.1 fps
|
24% 29.1 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
271% 1,238 MB/s
|
212% 79.4 MB/s
|
370% 534 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMA84GL7AFR4N-VK 2x31.5GB
2 of 16 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
63.3%
Good
|
69% 24 GB/s
|
35% 12.1 GB/s
|
46% 87.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X11DAi-N Builds (Compare 45 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Supermicro X11DAi-N
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 42101stBench 66%, 188 samples | 5x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 41141stBench 63%, 670 samples | 5x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 41081stBench 59%, 156 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples | 4x |
| Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 131%, 1,749 samples | 4x |
| Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples | 3x |
| SSD |
|
|---|---|
| 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 385%, 327,441 samples | 4x |
| 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $170Bench 322%, 93,447 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 152% - Outstanding | Total price: $90 |