Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics80.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateNov 29 '19 at 10:39
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 71.3
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 190
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 557
54% 446 Pts
64-Core 761
47% 761 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.15
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.2% Excellent
Lighting 96.3
Reflection 120
Parallax 112
78% 110 fps
MRender 99.5
Gravity 114
Splatting 95.2
84% 103 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 223 88 114 169 164 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 443
Write 435
Mixed 299
SusWrite 164
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 19.8
82% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 57.8
DQ Mixed 85.4
66% 93.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 97%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
235GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 395 409 428 430 439 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 459
Mixed 436
SusWrite 417
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 87.1
4K Mixed 46.6
159% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 373
280% 375 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
130GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 124 126 125 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 116
Write 83.7
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 125
72% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2133C15-8GVR Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.9% Good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 25.1
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 20.6
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 98.4
41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback