Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics60% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180921
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 01 '19 at 18:15
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-8700-$370
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
92% Outstanding
1-Core 136
2-Core 263
94% 199 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 812
84% 663 Pts
64-Core 1,081
72% 1,081 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 92%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Zotac(19DA 1370) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
60% Above average
Lighting 230
Reflection 213
Parallax 254
60% 232 fps
MRender 168
Gravity 216
Splatting 151
60% 178 fps
Poor: 55%
This bench: 60%
Great: 67%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$80
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 510 298 289 282 278 274 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 2,241
Write 1,425
Mixed 1,217
SusWrite 322
288% 1,301 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 77.4
276% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 920
DQ Write 1,055
DQ Mixed 991
746% 989 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 238%
Great: 277%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$78
430GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 469 488 489 427 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 490
Mixed 463
SusWrite 443
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 59.6
201% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 359
271% 364 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 126%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$30
388GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 42 41 33 44 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 67.7
Write 30.4
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 41.1
29% 39.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.1
34% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$30
263GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 94 90 91 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 72
Write 62.7
Mixed 48.3
SusWrite 91.8
50% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2733 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 30
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 23.1
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 27.5
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 53.8
74% 53.8 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 109%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II Builds (Compare 697 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 129%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $893
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $224
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback