Asus STRIX B250F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics92.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus STRIX B250F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '19 at 01:14
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600-$89
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 126
2-Core 225
85% 148 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 497
67% 498 Pts
64-Core 488
30% 488 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 115
Parallax 110
98% 115 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 91.3
Splatting 86.7
84% 105 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 97%
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.02% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 8.31
7% 9.49 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 7.47
Splatting 16.6
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.02%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 83 10 12 29 64 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.3% Poor
Read 220
Write 96
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 64.9
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 20.4
4K Mixed 11.2
48% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 14.2
DQ Write 27
DQ Mixed 124
65% 55.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 100%
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
11GB free
Firmware: CS900210
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 433
Write 344
Mixed 326
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 15
126% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 27.2
DQ Mixed 11
28% 62.8 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 87%
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
14GB free
Firmware: SBFK61E1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 471
Write 327
Mixed 348
85% 382 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 43.7
166% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 208
180% 265 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 91%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50
47GB free
Firmware: AX001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 77 79 80 79 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 66.5
Write 61.2
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 78.1
41% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 54%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50
9GB free
Firmware: AX001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 70 69 66 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 61.5
Write 63.7
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 68.7
40% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
84% Excellent
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 27
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 25.2
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX B250F GAMING Builds (Compare 2,546 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus STRIX B250F GAMING - $182

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $566
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback