Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	23.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3690-$990 4,808 User benchmarks, average bench 77% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Memory 95.1 1-Core 83.9 2-Core 170 70% 116 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 535 55% 446 Pts	64-Core 676 42% 676 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5770 37,602 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Sapphire(174B 1482) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Lighting 14.8 Reflection 11.4 Parallax 12.9 12% 13 fps	MRender 10.2 Gravity 11.2 Splatting 12.3 9% 11.2 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP S600 240GB 1,240 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: CH80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 1.1 99 16 53 43 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.4% Poor	Read 96.7 Write 98.8 Mixed 106 SusWrite 39.3 19% 85.1 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 22.4 4K Mixed 10.1 54% 17.3 MB/s	DQ Read 22.2 DQ Write 34.4 DQ Mixed 7.8 12% 21.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 96%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70 21,848 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 389GB free Firmware: 0001SDM5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 97 97 98 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	55.8% Above average	Read 97.2 Write 68.9 Mixed 45.6 SusWrite 97.3 56% 77.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 6 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.3% Poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 5.7 19% 6.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 8.4 25% 8.73 GB/s	Latency 56.8 70% 56.8 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $397

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16