Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	47.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170220
Uptime	10 Days
Run Date	Dec 04 '19 at 04:55
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$131 70,038 User benchmarks, average bench 66% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 73 1-Core 93.7 2-Core 215 70% 127 Pts	4-Core 369 8-Core 498 55% 433 Pts	64-Core 592 37% 592 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 853F) CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.4% Average	Lighting 57.8 Reflection 63 Parallax 56.1 47% 59 fps	MRender 69.9 Gravity 57 Splatting 51.8 48% 59.5 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75 16,709 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: X211200 SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 235 217 195 144 120 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	68.8% Good	Read 467 Write 209 Mixed 128 SusWrite 193 55% 249 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 73.7 4K Mixed 30.3 87% 36.7 MB/s	DQ Read 305 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 113 117% 194 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 91%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38 83,298 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 153GB free Firmware: M6CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 7.1 7.3 7.4 7.5 400 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 465 Write 435 Mixed 365 SusWrite 134 78% 350 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 97.7 4K Mixed 25.6 123% 49.6 MB/s	DQ Read 293 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 40.4 106% 223 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 92%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 27GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 104 104 107 118 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	62.4% Good	Read 110 Write 100 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 107 62% 85.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 103%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 931GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 133 134 133 135 135 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	Read 199 Write 165 Mixed 99.8 SusWrite 134 110% 149 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 36GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 96 96 96 96 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	68.9% Good	Read 144 Write 110 Mixed 76.3 SusWrite 95.3 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 201 192 184 192 201 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	99.9% Outstanding	Read 155 Write 160 Mixed 69.3 SusWrite 193 105% 144 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 99.9% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D2 2x8GB 1,659 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	80.4% Excellent	MC Read 32.6 MC Write 29.7 MC Mixed 28.8 87% 30.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 18.5 SC Mixed 22.8 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 94.6 42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $856

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)