Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H270M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '19 at 16:04
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 93.5
1-Core 134
2-Core 264
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 502
60% 465 Pts
64-Core 504
31% 504 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Lighting 42.6
Reflection 31
Parallax 37.1
35% 36.9 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 41.2
Splatting 36.5
31% 38.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 560 263 256 250 243 234 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1,141
Write 987
Mixed 549
SusWrite 301
166% 745 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 57.1
226% 86.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1173
DQ Write 1183
DQ Mixed 674
645% 1,010 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 185%
Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 191 190 193 193 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 145
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 192
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 112%
Great: 114%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
10GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 7.4 7.8 7.8 7.4 8.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
8.84% Terrible
Read 38.6
Write 14.6
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 7.5
19% 17.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
27% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.84%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
75.8% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 22.2
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H270M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $377
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback