Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	62.6% Good	Memory 79.9 1-Core 68.7 2-Core 133 57% 93.9 Pts	4-Core 254 8-Core 312 36% 283 Pts	64-Core 400 25% 400 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon 550 2,864 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Sapphire(1DA2 E367) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.7.2 Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Lighting 15.1 Reflection 26.3 Parallax 22.2 12% 21.2 fps	MRender 25.4 Gravity 17.1 Splatting 28.7 20% 23.8 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 75 85 88 88 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 231 Write 118 Mixed 169 SusWrite 85.4 34% 151 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 34.7 4K Mixed 18 66% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 75.4 DQ Write 89.6 DQ Mixed 93.3 67% 86.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 73%
Seagate ST380811AS 80GB-$99 2,717 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 67GB free Firmware: 3.AAE SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 56 58 58 57 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	30.8% Below average	Read 50.2 Write 30 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 56.9 32% 42.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 40%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 142 155 157 147 157 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	60% Above average	Read 60.8 Write 118 Mixed 39 SusWrite 148 66% 91.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.3 81% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2666 C19 1x8GB 2,427 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 11.5 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 11.9 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 80.7 50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 54%

Yacht

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	351x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	214x
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	202x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	142x
P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBCrucial $73Bench 212%, 171,271 samples	104x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	102x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	196x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples	164x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	126x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $437

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16