Asus CM6850

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	20.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus CM6850 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CM6850
Memory	10.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110427
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '16 at 16:44
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2310-$90 15,623 User benchmarks, average bench 65% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Memory 91 1-Core 81.9 2-Core 160 67% 111 Pts	4-Core 318 8-Core 317 42% 318 Pts	64-Core 319 20% 319 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% EVGA(3842 3757) CLim: 1463 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.54 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Lighting 26.5 Reflection 19.5 Parallax 24 22% 23.3 fps	MRender 27.2 Gravity 23.5 Splatting 19.2 19% 23.3 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100 67,541 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 229GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR021 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 17 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 8 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 63 158915166244 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 150802828 (F7) Unknown 100 100 4736512 (F8) Unknown 100 100 379425 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1257 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	41.4% Average	Read 260 Write 179 Mixed 183 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 30.2 4K Mixed 10.8 57% 19.7 MB/s	DQ Read 21.7 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 10.5 26% 51 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 95%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 931GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 178 172 2083 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 35 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 11 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 34 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 12 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 24 (C2) HDA temperature 107 107 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	79.2% Very good	Read 185 Write 90.9 Mixed 174 114% 150 MB/s	4K Read 1.29 4K Write 2.78 4K Mixed 0.36 145% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HB0NF-CG 3x4GB 165 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16.4 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 15.5 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 65.8 61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CM6850 Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6850

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	99x
Core i5-2320Intel $165Bench 64%, 38,345 samples	10x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	5x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	11x
GeForce GT 530NvidiaBench 3%, 5,672 samples	10x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	8x

SSD
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $31Bench 101%, 14,082 samples	7x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	11x
SLZ302G08-MDJHB 4x2GBUnknownBench 45%, 226 samples	7x
SLA302G08-GGNHC SLA302G08-GGNHC SLA302G08-GGNHC RMB4GB684CA3-16IC 16GBUnknownBench 44%, 5 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $226

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16