Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 65% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	89.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte B360M AORUS Gaming 3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF (all builds)
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190314
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '19 at 03:02
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	34%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Memory 80.1 1-Core 126 2-Core 254 84% 154 Pts	4-Core 475 8-Core 622 70% 549 Pts	64-Core 727 45% 727 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% MSI(1462 3734) CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.20 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89.5% Excellent	Lighting 110 Reflection 105 Parallax 105 90% 107 fps	MRender 153 Gravity 106 Splatting 83.4 90% 114 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 51 84 82 57 109 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	59.4% Above average	Read 348 Write 146 Mixed 221 SusWrite 98.7 45% 204 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 59.5 4K Mixed 25.5 96% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 229 DQ Write 220 DQ Mixed 123 120% 191 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 100%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 427GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 464 466 468 439 298 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 487 Write 467 Mixed 444 SusWrite 432 103% 458 MB/s	4K Read 36.1 4K Write 95 4K Mixed 50.8 170% 60.6 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 350 264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB 46,470 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	64.4% Good	MC Read 27.3 MC Write 24.7 MC Mixed 20.5 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 14.5 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 80.4 50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	475x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	346x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	265x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	166x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	160x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	150x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	113x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	70x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	47x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	130x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	108x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 76%, 20,001 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $529

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16