Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Memory 90.9 1-Core 60.8 2-Core 103 56% 85 Pts	4-Core 211 8-Core 277 31% 244 Pts	64-Core 274 17% 274 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6253) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	Lighting 39 Reflection 30.5 Parallax 37.2 32% 35.6 fps	MRender 37.8 Gravity 37.8 Splatting 35.8 30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 28 30 31 31 32 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 476GB free Firmware: 03.03B03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 107 110 108 108 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Read 109 Write 104 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 108 71% 96.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 933, 933 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	47% Average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 17.1 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 12.2 28% 9.73 GB/s	Latency 65.9 61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	8x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	5x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $71Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	4x

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $352

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16