Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	74.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro-CF (all builds)
Memory	15.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180302
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '19 at 19:07
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7920X-$250 5,430 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Memory 74.4 1-Core 132 2-Core 252 83% 153 Pts	4-Core 462 8-Core 904 81% 683 Pts	64-Core 1,958 121% 1,958 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 91%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 545s Series 512GB-$95 12,034 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 260GB free (System drive) Firmware: LHF002C SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 341 334 339 341 315 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Read 421 Write 331 Mixed 300 SusWrite 334 78% 346 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 42.9 4K Mixed 23.4 84% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 270 DQ Write 258 DQ Mixed 140 139% 223 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 188 189 183 185 188 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 132 Mixed 79.9 SusWrite 186 105% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	MC Read 35.2 MC Write 48.2 MC Mixed 30.8 109% 38.1 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 22 SC Mixed 10 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 91.5 44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 115%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $4Bench 228%, 10,188 samples	9x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	8x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	7x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $404

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16