Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N3700 11,299 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Memory 42.7 1-Core 24 2-Core 47.8 25% 38.2 Pts	4-Core 75.4 8-Core 57.4 9% 66.4 Pts	64-Core 77.1 5% 77.1 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB 66,048 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 358GB free (System drive) Firmware: GR2OA3J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 60 58 61 54 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	Read 22.2 Write 56.2 Mixed 26 SusWrite 56.5 30% 40.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.4 85% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 58%
hp v237w 16GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 5GB free, PID 7e40 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 1.7 3 3.2 2.2 3.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	1.36% Terrible	Read 4 Write 2 Mixed 3.5 SusWrite 2.8 4% 3.08 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 3% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.36% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6N1 1x4GB 9,805 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 3.9 12% 4.17 GB/s	SC Read 1.3 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 2.5 6% 2.27 GB/s	Latency 190 21% 190 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	2,494x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,737x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	1,180x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	399x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	377x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	342x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16