Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	17.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190410
Uptime	7.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '20 at 07:34
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	88.4% Excellent	Memory 89.1 1-Core 136 2-Core 253 89% 159 Pts	4-Core 471 8-Core 846 79% 659 Pts	64-Core 1,561 97% 1,561 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Asus(1043 86A5) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	15.1% Very poor	Lighting 0.03 Reflection 88.4 Parallax 84.8 0% 57.7 fps	MRender 102 Gravity 84.7 Splatting 0.13 44% 62.3 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35 32,229 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 33 23 24 34 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Read 37.5 Write 62.5 Mixed 39 SusWrite 28 31% 41.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.4 81% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 50%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$109 12,285 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 833GB free Firmware: JP4OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 129 129 131 131 131 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	74.5% Very good	Read 130 Write 128 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 130 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 76%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 196GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 120 119 121 121 119 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Read 173 Write 151 Mixed 80.5 SusWrite 120 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 31,785 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	86.3% Excellent	MC Read 34 MC Write 34.8 MC Mixed 27.7 92% 32.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 25.9 SC Mixed 19.3 57% 20 GB/s	Latency 68.4 58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 119%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 150%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 139%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,504x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,316x
RTX 2080Nvidia $407Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	1,129x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,351x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	1,044x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	802x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	740x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	586x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	524x

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,266

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16