Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2310M-$80 25,542 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	46.4% Average	Memory 80.1 1-Core 37.1 2-Core 80 44% 65.7 Pts	4-Core 80 8-Core 67.7 10% 73.8 Pts	64-Core 96.4 6% 96.4 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21DA) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.87% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 2.92 Parallax 1.38 2% 2.12 fps	MRender 2.81 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 3.78 2% 2.58 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.87% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149 16,872 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: DC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 97 92 83 199 181 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 361 Write 211 Mixed 226 SusWrite 126 51% 231 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 40.6 4K Mixed 27.7 94% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 136 107% 151 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 91%
Samsung S2 Portable 3 640GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 532GB free, PID 6094 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 24 26 26 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Read 29.8 Write 23.5 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 24.8 34% 25.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GB 7,983 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37% Below average	MC Read 12.7 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 12.2 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 9.9 28% 9.87 GB/s	Latency 80.3 50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16