| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 21.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Intel E5 M2L-8D (all builds) |
| Memory | 20.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190618 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 04 '20 at 18:59 |
| Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
66.2%
Good
|
59% 96.2 Pts
|
44% 363 Pts
|
68% 1,097 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1212 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.12.1
|
21.9%
Poor
|
21% 28.7 fps
|
24% 29.3 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 12 58 97 57 56 MB/s
|
41.7%
Average
|
58% 263 MB/s
|
55% 17.4 MB/s
|
41% 65.6 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B5170GB0- 4x4GB
4 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
58.7%
Above average
|
65% 22.7 GB/s
|
22% 7.77 GB/s
|
52% 77.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical E5 M2L-8D Builds (Compare 75 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Intel E5 M2L-8D
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2689 01stBench 66%, 461 samples | 12x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 9x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX Vega-56AMD $170Bench 78%, 92,053 samples | 8x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 7x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 109% - Outstanding | Total price: $170 |