| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190729 |
| Uptime | 1.4 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 04 '20 at 20:57 |
| Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 50% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.6%
Good
|
65% 111 Pts
|
50% 415 Pts
|
45% 734 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
MSI(1462 8A9C) 1GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 441.66
|
14.6%
Very poor
|
15% 16 fps
|
14% 18 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 654 360 353 339 336 328 MB/s
|
137%
Outstanding
|
199% 893 MB/s
|
110% 39.1 MB/s
|
440% 590 MB/s
|
|
WD Purple Surveillance 1TB (2017)-$45
237GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 91 91 89 89 87 MB/s
|
59.6%
Above average
|
76% 103 MB/s
|
188% 1.43 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
45GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 107 108 107 110 107 MB/s
|
61.8%
Good
|
59% 79.8 MB/s
|
202% 1.63 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
23GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 54 52 53 54 MB/s
|
31%
Below average
|
33% 44.6 MB/s
|
174% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
|
89.6%
Excellent
|
95% 33.4 GB/s
|
66% 23.1 GB/s
|
44% 90 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,520 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 415x |
| Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples | 326x |
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 204x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 214x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 194x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 188x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $847 |