DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemDELL Studio XPS 435T/9000  (all builds)
MotherboardDELL 0X501H
Memory8.9 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090728
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJan 05 '20 at 23:09
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 73.8
2-Core 141
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 355
38% 304 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5870
AMD(1002 0B00) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Lighting 27.1
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 27.4
22% 23.1 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 18.9
14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S31024G 1TB
753GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6104000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 237 237 239 239 239 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.1% Good
Read 249
Write 241
Mixed 217
SusWrite 238
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 51.4
4K Mixed 32.9
104% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 186
143% 195 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 121%
Seagate ST3500620AS 500GB-$145
335GB free
Firmware: HP24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 105 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 97.1
Write 87.4
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 106
62% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 59%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
790GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 28.2
Mixed 12.4
SusWrite 26.5
32% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
29% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 2048, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
43.7% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 16
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 11.4
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $177
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback