ASRock FATAL1TY Z170 GAMING K4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
6 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardASRock FATAL1TY Z170 GAMING K4  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160706
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 06 '20 at 15:29
Run Duration317 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-6700K-$275
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
1-Core 134
2-Core 225
87% 180 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 674
69% 544 Pts
64-Core 689
46% 689 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$685
MSI(1462 3723) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Lighting 456
Reflection 392
Parallax 504
120% 450 fps
MRender 369
Gravity 404
Splatting 229
116% 334 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 116%
Great: 132%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$115
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 7206
Write 8,564
Mixed 2,920
1,385% 6,230 MB/s
4K Read 628
4K Write 343
4K Mixed 436
1,691% 469 MB/s
DQ Read 1585
DQ Write 1,185
DQ Mixed 1,229
961% 1,333 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 133%
Kingston A400 480GB-$53
347GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 353 129 100 103 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 348
Write 106
Mixed 89
SusWrite 191
40% 184 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 19.1
4K Mixed 11.2
52% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 14.4
DQ Write 15.7
DQ Mixed 15.3
12% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 101%
Kingston SUV500960G 960GB
806GB free
Firmware: 003056RI
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 341 242 176 138 216 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 452
Write 378
Mixed 364
SusWrite 241
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 86.4
4K Mixed 38.5
147% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 169
152% 233 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 94%
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$109
223GB free
Firmware: E7FM04.C Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1077 1063 881 829 784 732 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,114
Write 1,255
Mixed 747
SusWrite 894
226% 1,003 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 56.4
206% 78.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1108
DQ Write 772
DQ Mixed 598
539% 826 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 204%
Great: 205%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$87
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 151 152 154 154 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 148
Write 140
Mixed 106
SusWrite 153
101% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 103%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
7.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 36.5
Write 36
Mixed 32
SusWrite 36.8
48% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1
200% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 82%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB
106GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 16 18 20 19 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 47
Write 22.5
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 15.3
24% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.8
46% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 36%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB
114GB free, PID 0743
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 72 70 81 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 81.8
Write 78.5
Mixed 65
SusWrite 77.3
102% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 4.2
280% 5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 44%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB
7GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 7.4 8.1 8.2 8.2 7.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
6.33% Terrible
Read 21
Write 7.3
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 7.6
12% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.33%
Great: 9%
Mass Storage Device 32GB
29GB free, PID 125d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 19.8
Write 19.5
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 20.2
27% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 3.5
207% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 17%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 990GB
497GB free, PID 00fe
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 110 109 108 108 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.2% Very good
Read 254
Write 104
Mixed 132
SusWrite 109
181% 150 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 4.9
333% 7.3 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 74%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -SD 256GB
179GB free, PID 8007
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 69 85 79 85 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 88
Write 37
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 72.7
72% 57.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 3.8
191% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$95
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 38.9
MC Mixed 27.3
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 36.6
SC Mixed 30
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 51.8
77% 51.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 106%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z170 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 3,127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: ASRock FATAL1TY Z170 GAMING K4 - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $964
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $146Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback