Toshiba QOSMIO X770

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba QOSMIO X770  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA PGRAA
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121030
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 07 '20 at 12:39
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Memory 59.3
1-Core 20.8
2-Core 37.4
29% 39.2 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 265
21% 187 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M
Toshiba(1179 FC05) 1.5GB
CLim: 775 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 388.68
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 9.31
Parallax 7.34
0% 5.57 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 9.83
Splatting 12.6
10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus XT SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$35
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: TD27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 80 80 81 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 100
Write 95
Mixed 64
SusWrite 82.6
63% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 58%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
8GB free
Firmware: AX00
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 93.9
Mixed 32.8
47% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
WD Elements 1078 2TB
151GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 63 56 59 59 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
23.1% Poor
Read 45.4
Write 31.4
Mixed 24
SusWrite 57.2
53% 39.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
41.2% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.3
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical QOSMIO X770 Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba QOSMIO X770

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $200
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback