Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131213
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 07 '20 at 19:47
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	60%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100 22,204 User benchmarks, average bench 77% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 83.4 1-Core 89.9 2-Core 180 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 529 52% 427 Pts	64-Core 672 42% 672 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329 50,279 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 2980) 3GB CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 440.97 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	32.2% Below average	Lighting 46.5 Reflection 42.8 Parallax 58.6 38% 49.3 fps	MRender 33.8 Gravity 23.6 Splatting 22.3 21% 26.6 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial_ Crucial_CT128MX1 128GB 70 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 119GB free Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 179 166 173 179 178 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	71.3% Very good	Read 400 Write 173 Mixed 216 SusWrite 174 53% 241 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 70.3 4K Mixed 30.3 111% 41.1 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 37.2 82% 171 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 90%
SanDisk SSD Plus 480GB-$40 16,752 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 327GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z320 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 62 125 140 114 76 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.1% Below average	Read 170 Write 165 Mixed 18 SusWrite 108 26% 115 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 62.3 4K Mixed 8.2 51% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 0.1 35% 85.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 658GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 115 129 130 136 132 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	Read 50.8 Write 115 Mixed 54 SusWrite 128 64% 87 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB 18,444 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	46.9% Average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 15.3 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 11 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 74.4 54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 71%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 37%

Jet ski

RAM
HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 5,910 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	22x
RipjawsZ DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 73%, 3,160 samples	21x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $1,178

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16