To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '20 at 20:00
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8300-$115
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Memory 21.5
1-Core 16.3
2-Core 65
18% 34.3 Pts
4-Core 31.2
8-Core 95
7% 63.1 Pts
64-Core 117
7% 117 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 51%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 206
Write 182
Mixed 171
41% 186 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 28.9
98% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 30.3
DQ Write 75.8
DQ Mixed 38.7
34% 48.3 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD WD6400AACS-00G8B1 640GB
217GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,085
Write 19.3
Mixed 35.5
273% 380 MB/s
4K Read 223
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.9
9,538% 75.5 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 4.7
13% 4.63 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 3.5
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 310
13% 310 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback