| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP xw6600 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0A9Ch |
| Memory | 26 GB free of 32.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20081015 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 11 '20 at 20:49 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 29% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5420-$79
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
|
33.4%
Below average
|
29% 43.7 Pts
|
15% 112 Pts
|
7% 120 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Nvidia(10DE 0984) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.2%
Poor
|
25% 31.4 fps
|
29% 36.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PNY CS900 240GB-$22
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900BB3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 156 173 178 181 182 MB/s
|
40.8%
Average
|
39% 171 MB/s
|
69% 23.1 MB/s
|
31% 43.5 MB/s
|
|
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 157 169 173 177 175 MB/s
|
97.2%
Outstanding
|
105% 144 MB/s
|
321% 3.57 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 65GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
|
12%
Very poor
|
11% 3.93 GB/s
|
8% 2.83 GB/s
|
24% 169 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical xw6600 Workstation Builds (Compare 109 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP xw6600 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E54501stBench 47%, 442 samples | 19x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E54501stBench 47%, 569 samples | 15x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E54301stBench 46%, 705 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 5x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $139 |