| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Micro-Star MS-7B79 |
| Motherboard | MSI X470 GAMING PRO MAX (MS-7B79) (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191106 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 12 '20 at 13:08 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
89.7%
Excellent
|
90% 171 Pts
|
90% 721 Pts
|
66% 1,067 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
35.1%
Below average
|
32% 40.9 fps
|
40% 49.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 447 460 463 464 465 MB/s
|
101%
Outstanding
|
104% 463 MB/s
|
140% 57.2 MB/s
|
86% 175 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 214 213 218 217 219 MB/s
|
||||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
69.1%
Good
|
71% 24.9 GB/s
|
60% 20.9 GB/s
|
41% 97.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X470 GAMING PRO MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 442 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO MAX (MS-7B79)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 124x |
| Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples | 94x |
| Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 47x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 41x |
| RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 22x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 22x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 128% - Outstanding | Total price: $381 |