HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics89.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190820
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateJan 15 '20 at 04:47
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$290
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 148
2-Core 298
98% 179 Pts
4-Core 581
8-Core 1,146
102% 864 Pts
64-Core 1,120
69% 1,120 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
HP(103C 8557) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.6
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.4% Excellent
Lighting 114
Reflection 109
Parallax 111
93% 111 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 98.1
Splatting 79.7
83% 105 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv128g TOSHIBA 128GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 528 569 522 72 45 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 589
Write 488
Mixed 538
SusWrite 366
111% 495 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 60.3
204% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 258
204% 288 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 123%
Great: 135%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 402 446 451 453 426 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 385
Write 368
Mixed 367
SusWrite 420
87% 385 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 29.3
95% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 138
102% 134 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: VX14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 216 215 217 218 218 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 145
Write 195
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 215
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 24.6
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 26.7
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,032 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $343
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback