PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Dell OptiPlex 9020 |
Motherboard | Dell OptiPlex 9020 (all builds) |
Memory | 10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20140901 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jan 15 '20 at 14:32 |
Run Duration | 199 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
74.9%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Dell(1028 05A4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4170
|
1.91%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HTS725032A7E630 320GB-$89
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GHBO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 51 41 49 51 50 MB/s
|
34.7%
Below average
|
|||
LaCie d2 quadra 1TB
15GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 8.9 8.9 9.2 8.5 8.6 MB/s
|
10.4%
Very poor
|
|||
LaCie d2 quadra 1TB
12GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 8.9 8.9 9.2 8.5 8.7 MB/s
|
10.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Maxtor OneTouch 123GB
0GB free, PID 7010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 3.9 3.2 1.9 6.4 6 MB/s
|
3.56%
Terrible
|
|||
LaCie d2 Quadra v3C 3TB
1TB free, PID 107e
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 8.9 9 9.2 8.6 8.7 MB/s
|
10.9%
Very poor
|
|||
LaCie d2 Quadra v3C 3TB
1TB free, PID 105e
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 8.9 9 9.2 8.6 8.7 MB/s
|
11.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT102464BD160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
61.2%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 3,451x |
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 2,213x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 1,850x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 3,540x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 708x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 681x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $178 |