Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	37.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE (all builds)
Memory	26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190613
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '20 at 17:09
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	91.1% Outstanding	Memory 74.7 1-Core 148 2-Core 293 92% 172 Pts	4-Core 574 8-Core 1,138 101% 856 Pts	64-Core 1,438 89% 1,438 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 91.1% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon-VII-$841 13,762 User benchmarks, average bench 101% AMD(1002 081E) Ram: 16GB, Driver: 20.1.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	37.2% Below average	Lighting 0.07 Reflection 100 Parallax 217 0% 106 fps	MRender 102 Gravity 148 Splatting 144 109% 131 fps
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 24 27 30 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 339 Write 22.3 Mixed 38.2 SusWrite 25.4 22% 106 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 23.1 4K Mixed 15.7 59% 18.8 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 22.8 DQ Mixed 43.3 45% 77.2 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 121%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 123GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 129 129 129 128 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	76% Very good	Read 136 Write 146 Mixed 88 SusWrite 129 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 109%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 869GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 105 106 106 106 105 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Read 88.3 Write 72.5 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 106 61% 82.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 31,785 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.3% Very good	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 29.6 74% 25.8 GB/s	SC Read 21.7 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 28.9 65% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 91.1 44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 119%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 159%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 161%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	913x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	880x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	698x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	599x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	431x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	398x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	303x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	299x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	275x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,486

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16