Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190329
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 16 '20 at 00:17
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$131
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 247
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 730
75% 604 Pts
64-Core 706
44% 706 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.7% Good
Lighting 79.6
Reflection 78.9
Parallax 65.8
65% 74.8 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 71.7
Splatting 71.3
58% 71.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,470
Write 1,612
Mixed 1,330
398% 1,804 MB/s
4K Read 65.2
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 88.7
298% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,012
DQ Write 1298
DQ Mixed 1,167
878% 1,159 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
WD Green 240GB (2016)
25GB free
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 96 83 77 70 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 460
Write 202
Mixed 191
SusWrite 84.9
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 17.1
4K Mixed 12.3
45% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 31.7
57% 114 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 62 62 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 48
Write 66.5
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 61.7
43% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.9
215% 2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
476GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 138 135 138 140 137 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 117
Write 80.2
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 138
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16/8G KHX2666C16/8G Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSB.16FBD2 Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSB.16FBD2 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.9% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 27.5
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 34.4
SC Mixed 25.4
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback