PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1494 |
Memory | 17.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1862 x 1048 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180214 |
Uptime | 16.4 Days |
Run Date | Jan 16 '20 at 03:48 |
Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 71% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
55.8%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Zotac(19DA 2455) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 53 42 39 55 61 MB/s
|
37.4%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 1TB
412GB free, PID 5031
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 23 22 MB/s
|
9.96%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown DDR3-1600 CL11 8GB 8GBH2X04F1AA28-15 DDR3-1600 CL11 8GB 8GBH2X04F1AA28-15 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
|
42.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 684x |
Core i7-2600Intel $196Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 590x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 315x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 423x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 137x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 86x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |