Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 17 '20 at 23:09
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
84% 155 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 706
69% 565 Pts
64-Core 707
44% 707 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
MSI(1462 3711) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
155% Outstanding
Lighting 215
Reflection 223
Parallax 225
175% 221 fps
MRender 257
Gravity 208
Splatting 136
157% 200 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 155%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X400 1TB-$310
912GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4162000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 295 289 292 290 287 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 451
Write 428
Mixed 233
SusWrite 299
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 36
123% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 209
182% 273 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88%
Great: 106%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380
3.5TB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 473 465 479 482 481 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 471
Mixed 441
SusWrite 474
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 58.5
196% 71.1 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 351
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB
24GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 26 24 26 24 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 208
Write 33.5
Mixed 45.5
SusWrite 24.8
76% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 12
4K Mixed 10.5
812% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 16.5
DQ Write 10.9
DQ Mixed 11.5
823% 13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.9% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 23.5
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 22.1
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,898 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $655
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback