Asus P6T DELUXE V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics1.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P6T DELUXE V2  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101222
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 21 '20 at 10:59
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5670
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 95.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 203
78% 133 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 613
62% 504 Pts
64-Core 696
43% 696 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 83C7) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.44
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.21% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.54
Parallax 0.47
1% 1.44 fps
MRender 2.81
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.87
2% 1.85 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.21%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 151 148 150 147 160 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 473
Write 303
Mixed 266
SusWrite 155
66% 299 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 29.1
108% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 107
97% 151 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
35GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 232 242 208 196 192 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 476
Write 300
Mixed 294
SusWrite 215
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 34.6
118% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 309
240% 330 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 124%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$25
227GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 101 100 101 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 98.8
Write 99.6
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 101
66% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
438GB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 115 114 112 114 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 108
Write 105
Mixed 59.6
SusWrite 113
71% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 100%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
96GB free
Firmware: 01.00A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 44 45 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 81
Write 78.5
Mixed 61
SusWrite 44.6
49% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 54%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 128 124 126 127 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 124
Write 124
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 126
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 18.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.7
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 55.1
72% 55.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6T DELUXE V2 Builds (Compare 1,040 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T DELUXE V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $306
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback