Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	69% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191119
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '20 at 16:15
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	88.4% Excellent	Memory 74.7 1-Core 147 2-Core 284 90% 169 Pts	4-Core 548 8-Core 880 88% 714 Pts	64-Core 1368 85% 1368 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$396 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3728) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 166 Reflection 154 Parallax 149 135% 156 fps	Gravity 142 Splatting 105 107% 124 fps
Poor: 109% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 69 61 46 46 71 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	69% Good	Read 483 Write 352 Mixed 318 SusWrite 84.2 69% 309 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 71.6 4K Mixed 31.7 122% 44 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 97.6 90% 140 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 82%
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$47 23,658 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 140GB free Firmware: X61130WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 207 208 204 206 199 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	88.4% Excellent	Read 501 Write 328 Mixed 326 SusWrite 207 76% 340 MB/s	4K Read 35.8 4K Write 80.2 4K Mixed 42.5 151% 52.8 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 189 145% 197 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 105%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 50GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 148 146 147 147 148 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	Read 130 Write 127 Mixed 91 SusWrite 147 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 217% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.4% Good	MC Read 28.5 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 27.3 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 25.2 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 91.1 44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,568 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,025x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $185Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	739x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	560x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	559x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	366x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	338x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	416x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	351x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	227x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	218x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $95Bench 95%, 56,114 samples	126x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	109x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,255

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16