Asrock H77M

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	36.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock H77M (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130809
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '20 at 00:29
Run Duration	199 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Memory 90.9 1-Core 108 2-Core 216 79% 138 Pts	4-Core 408 8-Core 519 59% 464 Pts	64-Core 522 32% 522 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Lighting 46.6 Reflection 32.7 Parallax 39.5 38% 39.6 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 43.3 Splatting 38.1 32% 39.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB 26,055 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT24B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,541 Write 5,137 Mixed 5,233 1,184% 5,304 MB/s	4K Read 386 4K Write 223 4K Mixed 268 1,046% 292 MB/s	DQ Read 935 DQ Write 623 DQ Mixed 731 558% 763 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 466GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 840 863 842 820 822 820 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	200% Outstanding	Read 1,182 Write 966 Mixed 990 SusWrite 835 223% 993 MB/s	4K Read 44.8 4K Write 133 4K Mixed 63.1 219% 80.3 MB/s	DQ Read 803 DQ Write 730 DQ Mixed 758 571% 763 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 200% Great: 355%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB 14,526 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 406GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 27 27 27 27 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	11.3% Very poor	Read 31.9 Write 30.1 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 26.5 7% 29.9 MB/s	4K Read 7.8 4K Write 7.8 4K Mixed 8.5 27% 8.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 84GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 117 117 116 117 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Read 111 Write 112 Mixed 66.8 SusWrite 117 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 109%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 931GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 94 95 94 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Read 97 Write 50.9 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 94.6 57% 76.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 2x4GB 1,719 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	58.7% Above average	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 18.1 58% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 18.8 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 65.9 61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H77M Builds (Compare 366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H77M - $186

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	54x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	43x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	42x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	34x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	31x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	24x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	7x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	16x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	15x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $571

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16