Asus AM1M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus AM1M-E  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160406
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 31 '20 at 17:57
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron 2650 APU R3
FS1b , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.45 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Memory 51.3
1-Core 12.4
2-Core 38.9
24% 34.2 Pts
4-Core 44.4
8-Core 43.4
6% 43.9 Pts
64-Core 44.4
3% 44.4 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8240
Asus(1043 8623) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.0.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.44% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 1.91
1% 2.3 fps
MRender 2.57
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.78
2% 2.22 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.44%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150
235GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JPFO
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 768
Write 18
Mixed 21.5
193% 269 MB/s
4K Read 159
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 2.1
6,866% 54 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5773SB0-CK0 4GB
667, 800 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.7% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 5.4
14% 4.73 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 5.2
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AM1M-E Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus AM1M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback