Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4000 14,024 User benchmarks, average bench 24% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	29.5% Poor	Memory 41.2 1-Core 49.5 2-Core 100 36% 63.6 Pts	4-Core 104 8-Core 104 14% 104 Pts	64-Core 104 6% 104 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Dell(1028 083B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4974 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.98% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 2.85 Parallax 2.03 2% 2.31 fps	MRender 3.14 Gravity 2 Splatting 3.91 3% 3.02 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.98% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Dell WR202KD032G E70290F5 31GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: 90014a SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 28 24 27 26 23 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMA851S6CJR6N-UH 1x4GB 1,991 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.6% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 5.8 18% 6.4 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.53 GB/s	Latency 197 20% 197 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 39%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4000IntelBench 24%, 14,024 samples	4x
Pentium Silver N5000IntelBench 34%, 12,140 samples	4x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	4x
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	4x

SSD
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	2x
S800 240GBRamstaBench 57%, 1,330 samples	1x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	1x

RAM
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GBUnknownBench 33%, 8,561 samples	2x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	2x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 32%, 40,829 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16