Asrock 990FX Killer/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Killer/3.1  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160114
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '20 at 19:01
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 81.2
1-Core 66.5
2-Core 112
55% 86.6 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 326
32% 262 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E387) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.3
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52% Above average
Lighting 63.7
Reflection 68.6
Parallax 91.1
52% 74.5 fps
MRender 69.8
Gravity 68.4
Splatting 56.3
52% 64.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 326 293 295 293 292 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 549
Write 488
Mixed 342
SusWrite 321
95% 425 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 39.2
134% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 37
DQ Write 69.8
DQ Mixed 42.4
35% 49.7 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 158
Mixed 54.5
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ16GX3M2A1866C10 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G CMZ16GX3M2A1866C10 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.4% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 14.5
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 11.3
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Killer/3.1 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $326
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback